The Bugliosi Book: Argument, Hyperbole and Bombast JFK: The 'abrasion collar' indicates an upward rising bullet If Oswald shot JFK, there would be a downward indication Evidence supports a frontal shot, not one from the above rear How the evidence is phonied for TV Jim's website CTKA.net/Probe Magazine The Zapruder Film and why the official ballistics aren't correct So many have altered and ignored the evidence A new researcher could be easily confused by the conflicts What you would have to believe to believe the official story Bullet fragments found years later Getting Oswald to Mexico City (Ostensibly) The Lopez report: Bugliosi calls it a giant dud Names you don't see in the Warren Report Interviews edited out because the descriptions don't mach Contradictions in the Oswald 'Mexico' identity and the real Oswald Why did the CIA never come up with a good photograph of Oswald in Mexico? David Atlee Phillips covering his tracks? Bugliosi chooses to believe David Phillips Phillips makes nothing but excuses for the missing Oswald photos The 'Mexico' Oswald is very different than the one we know Even the Cuban consulate people describe this 'different' Oswald Twists and turns through the Oswalds The deception seems to attempt to cover who Oswald really was working for The Evidence photos and audio tape are not of Oswald A Hoover memo identifies CIA as deceiving FBI over Oswald's identity There can be no denying that Oswald was impersonated in Mexico City Jim mentions an in depth review of this material on CTKA

[ Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:00:00 -0800 ]

Listen

Download

Listen on your iPhone